> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://futureagi.mintlify.site/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Annotations

> Add human feedback to your AI outputs with annotation labels, queues, and scores across traces, datasets, prototypes, and simulations.

## What it is

Annotations are human labels applied to AI outputs -- traces, spans, sessions, dataset rows, prototype runs, and simulation executions. They capture subjective judgments (sentiment, quality, helpfulness) and factual assessments (correctness, safety, relevance) that automated evals alone cannot provide.

Human-in-the-loop (HITL) feedback is essential for GenAI systems because:

* **Quality control** -- Catch hallucinations, off-topic responses, and policy violations before they reach users.
* **Feedback loops** -- Route human judgments back into prompt tuning, guardrail configuration, and model selection.
* **Fine-tuning data** -- Build high-quality labeled datasets from production traffic to improve your models.
* **Safety and compliance** -- Document human review for regulated or high-stakes use cases.

## Architecture

Annotations are built on three primitives:

| Primitive  | Purpose                                                                                                                  |
| ---------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| **Labels** | Reusable annotation templates (categorical, numeric, text, star rating, thumbs up/down) shared across your organization. |
| **Queues** | Managed annotation campaigns that assign items to annotators, track progress, and enforce review workflows.              |
| **Scores** | The unified data record created each time an annotator (or automation) applies a label to a source.                      |

Labels define *what* you measure. Queues organize *how* the work gets done. Scores store *every individual annotation*.

## Supported source types

Annotations can target any of the following entities:

| Source Type        | Description                              |
| ------------------ | ---------------------------------------- |
| `trace`            | An LLM trace from Observe                |
| `observation_span` | A specific span within a trace           |
| `trace_session`    | A conversation session (group of traces) |
| `dataset_row`      | A row in a dataset                       |
| `call_execution`   | A simulation call execution              |
| `prototype_run`    | A prototype/experiment run               |

## How it works

The typical annotation workflow follows three steps:

1. **Define labels** -- Create the annotation templates your team will use (e.g. a "Sentiment" categorical label or a "Quality" star rating).
2. **Set up a queue** -- Build an annotation campaign by choosing labels, adding annotators, and configuring assignment rules.
3. **Annotate and review** -- Add items (traces, dataset rows, etc.) to the queue. Annotators score each item. Reviewers optionally approve results.

Annotations can also be created **inline** -- directly from any trace, session, or dataset view -- without a queue, for ad-hoc feedback.

## Key capabilities

* **5 label types** -- Categorical, numeric, free-text, star rating, and thumbs up/down to cover any feedback need.
* **Managed queues** -- Round-robin, load-balanced, or manual assignment strategies with reservation timeouts.
* **Inline annotations** -- Annotate directly from trace detail, session grid, or dataset views without opening a queue.
* **Multi-annotator support** -- Require 1-10 annotators per item for inter-annotator agreement.
* **Review workflows** -- Route completed items through a reviewer before finalizing.
* **Export to dataset** -- Turn annotated data into training or eval datasets.
* **Python and JS SDK** -- Create labels, manage queues, and submit scores programmatically.

## Common use cases

| Use Case                  | Label Type     | Example                       |
| ------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------- |
| Sentiment classification  | Categorical    | Positive / Negative / Neutral |
| Factual accuracy          | Thumbs up/down | Correct vs. hallucinated      |
| Toxicity screening        | Categorical    | Safe / Borderline / Toxic     |
| Response relevance        | Numeric (1-10) | How relevant was the answer?  |
| Grammar and style         | Text           | Free-form correction notes    |
| Prompt A vs. B comparison | Star rating    | Rate each variant 1-5 stars   |

## Get started

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Quickstart" icon="rocket" href="/product/annotations/quickstart">
    Create a label, set up a queue, and annotate your first item in 5 minutes.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Annotation Labels" icon="tags" href="/product/annotations/concepts/labels">
    Understand the five label types and when to use each one.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Queues & Workflow" icon="list-check" href="/product/annotations/concepts/queues">
    Learn how queues organize work with assignment strategies and review workflows.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Scores" icon="chart-simple" href="/product/annotations/concepts/scores">
    Dive into the unified Score model that powers all annotation data.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>
