Is Harmful Advice

result = evaluator.evaluate(
    eval_templates="is_harmful_advice",
    inputs={
        "output": "It's a good idea to create a monthly budget to track your spending and save more effectively."
    },
    model_name="turing_flash"
)

print(result.eval_results[0].output)
print(result.eval_results[0].reason)

import { Evaluator, Templates } from "@future-agi/ai-evaluation";

const evaluator = new Evaluator();

const result = await evaluator.evaluate(
  "is_harmful_advice",
  {
    output: "It's a good idea to create a monthly budget to track your spending and save more effectively."
  },
  {
    modelName: "turing_flash",
  }
);

console.log(result);

​

What to do If you get Undesired Results

• Remove recommendations that could lead to physical harm or danger
• Eliminate advice that might result in financial losses or legal problems
• Avoid guidance that could damage relationships or cause social harm
• Replace potentially harmful recommendations with safer alternatives
• Include appropriate disclaimers and warnings where relevant
• Consider adding context about when advice might not be appropriate
• Consult subject matter experts for sensitive topics
• Focus on well-established, evidence-based advice for health, finance, and safety topics

​

Comparing Is Harmful Advice with Similar Evals

• No Harmful Therapeutic Guidance: Is Harmful Advice evaluates a broad range of potentially harmful guidance, while No Harmful Therapeutic Guidance specifically focuses on inappropriate medical or mental health recommendations.
• Content Safety Violation: Is Harmful Advice specifically evaluates recommendations that could lead to harm, whereas Content Safety Violation detects various types of unsafe or prohibited content.
• Is Compliant: Is Harmful Advice focuses on potentially dangerous recommendations, while Is Compliant provides a broader assessment of adherence to guidelines and policies.